Burnham Holdings

Burnham Holdings’ History with Asbestos

Until the late 1980s, boilers contained a number of asbestos-containing products, including insulation around the boiler’s walls, tube banks and internal pipes, gaskets, bearings to paste lagging or even raw asbestos.

These materials remain in many commercial, residential and industrial buildings as well as ships built before 1975. Disturbing asbestos-containing parts on these boilers can lead to asbestos exposure.

Asbestos-related personal injury claims have been filed by individuals that were exposed to asbestos from Burnham Holdings products, more specifically, products from its Burnham Commercial facilities.

Unlike many companies that manufactured asbestos-containing products, Burnham has not created a bankruptcy trust for asbestos claims. Instead, the company has decided to continue to defend itself in court.

Asbestos Litigation Involving Burnham Holdings

Burnham has been asked to pay millions of dollars in asbestos claims. Because of the long latency period of asbestos-related conditions, between 20 to 60 years, the company expects more lawsuits in the future.

According to Burnham Holdings’ 2020 financial report, charges for uninsured litigation were $383,000 and expenses for legal counsel, consultants and other costs to defend claims (including asbestos claims) was $104,000.

In the company’s 2018 financial report, uninsured litigation cost them $1.25 million and they paid $187,000 to defend claims.

The company says it believes the vast majority of future asbestos claims should be resolved within existing insurance limits and reserves — whether it be through trial verdicts or out-of-court settlements.

However, Burnham Holdings officials did note that asbestos litigation involves many uncertainties and the company cannot predict the extent to which new claims will be filed or the financial impact it may have on the business.

Case of Five Plaintiffs Exposed to Asbestos

In July 2013, a New York jury awarded $190 million in an asbestos-related lawsuit involving Burnham Commercial. Five plaintiffs were exposed to asbestos while working in the plumbing, steamfitting and construction industries and developed mesothelioma as a result of their exposure.

One plaintiff handled and demolished boilers with asbestos-containing components throughout his career. Another plaintiff, a steamfitter, handled boilers containing asbestos.

A third plaintiff, a pipefitter, worked at New York’s Brooklyn Navy Yard from 1951 and 1966 and was exposed while handling pipes of distillers that processed saltwater. The other two plaintiffs were plumbers who handled boilers and pipes covered in asbestos.

Burnham Commercial’s monetary obligations for the five lawsuits totaled $42.2 million, or 21.2% of the total damages awarded. However, the company filed post-trial motions and appeals seeking to reduce or overturn the verdicts.

On February 9, 2015, New York Supreme Court Judge Joan Madden ruled that all five damage awards “deviate from reasonable compensation,” and significantly reduced Burnham Commercial’s liability to less than $7 million.

Case of Steamfitter Charles Hillyer

In 2014, a separate lawsuit returned a $6 million verdict against the company, but that too was later reduced by an appeals court to less than $2 million. The plaintiff in that case, Charles Hillyer, allegedly developed mesothelioma from asbestos exposure while working as a steamfitter from 1960 to 1983.

Hillyer testified he had been exposed to asbestos insulation on boilers, including those made by Burnham Commercial. He was diagnosed with mesothelioma in March 2013 and died in September 2014. Hillyer’s family took over the lawsuit after his death.

In Hillyer’s case, New York judge Cynthia Kern ruled the $20 million award for past pain and suffering against Burnham and several other boiler manufacturers “deviates materially from what would be reasonable.” The total award was reduced to $6 million, with Burnham’s liability reduced to $2 million.

Burnham Holdings’ Asbestos Products and Workers at Risk

Burnham’s boilers contained asbestos through the 1980s. Anyone who manufactured these products or worked around Burnham boilers in their career was at risk of asbestos exposure.

Burnham Holdings History

Burnham Commercial traces its origins to the mid-1880s when Frederick A. Lord founded a New York-based greenhouse manufacturer, then named Lord’s Horticultural Manufacturing Company. In 1872, Lord’s son-in-law, William Burnham, joined the company to help make greenhouses for large estates in upstate New York.

Shortly after, the greenhouse industry was in need of a solution to provide adjustable and evenly distributed heat to large areas, which motivated the company to make its first cast iron boiler. Lord’s Horticultural Manufacturing Company later became known as the Lord & Burnham Company.

In 1905, it merged with the Pierson-Sefton Company and the Hitchings Company, which specialized in manufacturing heating systems and ventilating systems for greenhouses, to form the Burnham-Pierson-Sefton Corporation.

Following growth and acquisitions, the Burnham Boiler Company was established in 1919 and took over the boiler business from Lord & Burnham Company and its affiliated companies. The company was renamed Burnham Corporation and is currently referred to as Burnham Commercial, and it is owned by Burnham Holdings.

Today, headquartered in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Burnham Commercial continues to produce steam and hot water boilers for commercial and industrial applications, although asbestos is no longer added to components. The company’s products are sold in the U.S., Canada and Mexico and are used throughout schools, government buildings, places of worship and historical sites.

Recommended Reading